# threads

id: 019e8101-ccb6-7801-bf9e-105e8de6320e
source: exec
model_provider: openai
cwd: C:\Users\decid\Documents\projects\spt-core
sandbox_policy: {"type":"read-only"}
approval_mode: never
git_sha: a7128b6c33bdf83e3d2379926285250cadcfa41d
git_branch: main
git_origin_url: https://github.com/SaberMage/spt-core.git
cli_version: 0.130.0
memory_mode: enabled
model: gpt-5.5
reasoning_effort: high
rollout_path:
  C:\Users\decid\.codex\sessions\2026\05\31\rollout-2026-05-31T19-27-19-019e8101-ccb6-7801-bf9e-105e8de6320e.jsonl

title:
  IMPORTANT: Do NOT read or execute any files under ~/.claude/, ~/.agents/, .claude/skills/, or agents/. These are Claude Code skill definitions for a different AI system. Do NOT modify agents/openai.yaml. Stay focused on repository code/docs only.

  You are a brutally honest staff-level distributed-systems architect doing an ADVERSARIAL red-team review of a design BEFORE any code is written. No compliments. Just fatal flaws, contradictions, over-engineering, and unproven load-bearing assumptions that would force a redesign.

  Read these files in the repo and review them:
  - PRD.md (requirements)
  - CONTEXT.md (glossary / domain model)
  - docs/adr/0001-clean-room-fork-from-claude-skill-owl.md
  - docs/adr/0002-bake-networking-into-core-collapse-spt-node.md
  - docs/adr/0003-multi-instance-node-anchored-identity-model.md
  - docs/adr/0004-single-daemon-broker-brain-split-and-self-update.md
  - docs/adr/0005-totp-seeded-spake2-node-pairing.md
  - docs/KNOWN-HAZARDS.md

  Context: spt-core is a harness-independent Rust core for an agent ecosystem (messaging, live-agent lifecycle, terminal hosting, P2P networking via Iroh WAN + mDNS LAN, runtime-manifest harness contract). Clean-room rebuild of claude_skill_owl. v1 scope is LOCKED as the full PRD — do NOT propose scope cuts. Finding fatal flaws IS the goal.

  Concentrate fire on the riskiest decisions, ranked:
  1. ADR-0004 broker/brain split: a PTY child + an open client socket must SURVIVE a daemon-logic restart (no-terminate handoff) + peer-propagated signed self-update. Is the no-terminate handoff actually achievable on BOTH Windows ConPTY and Linux, or is it a fatal assumption? Attack the FD/handle-passing and self-update story specifically.
  2. ADR-0002 baking networking into core / collapsing spt-node into one binary.
  3. ADR-0003 multi-instance node-anchored identity.
  4. ADR-0005 TOTP-seeded SPAKE2 pairing (crypto soundness, replay, MITM).
  5. KNOWN-HAZARDS: are the listed invariants sufficient, or is something load-bearing missing?

  For each finding give: severity (FATAL / SERIOUS / MINOR), the exact ADR/file, the assumption, why it breaks, and what evidence or spike would resolve it. End with the single decision most likely to force a redesign. Be terse and technical.

first_user_message:
  IMPORTANT: Do NOT read or execute any files under ~/.claude/, ~/.agents/, .claude/skills/, or agents/. These are Claude Code skill definitions for a different AI system. Do NOT modify agents/openai.yaml. Stay focused on repository code/docs only.

  You are a brutally honest staff-level distributed-systems architect doing an ADVERSARIAL red-team review of a design BEFORE any code is written. No compliments. Just fatal flaws, contradictions, over-engineering, and unproven load-bearing assumptions that would force a redesign.

  Read these files in the repo and review them:
  - PRD.md (requirements)
  - CONTEXT.md (glossary / domain model)
  - docs/adr/0001-clean-room-fork-from-claude-skill-owl.md
  - docs/adr/0002-bake-networking-into-core-collapse-spt-node.md
  - docs/adr/0003-multi-instance-node-anchored-identity-model.md
  - docs/adr/0004-single-daemon-broker-brain-split-and-self-update.md
  - docs/adr/0005-totp-seeded-spake2-node-pairing.md
  - docs/KNOWN-HAZARDS.md

  Context: spt-core is a harness-independent Rust core for an agent ecosystem (messaging, live-agent lifecycle, terminal hosting, P2P networking via Iroh WAN + mDNS LAN, runtime-manifest harness contract). Clean-room rebuild of claude_skill_owl. v1 scope is LOCKED as the full PRD — do NOT propose scope cuts. Finding fatal flaws IS the goal.

  Concentrate fire on the riskiest decisions, ranked:
  1. ADR-0004 broker/brain split: a PTY child + an open client socket must SURVIVE a daemon-logic restart (no-terminate handoff) + peer-propagated signed self-update. Is the no-terminate handoff actually achievable on BOTH Windows ConPTY and Linux, or is it a fatal assumption? Attack the FD/handle-passing and self-update story specifically.
  2. ADR-0002 baking networking into core / collapsing spt-node into one binary.
  3. ADR-0003 multi-instance node-anchored identity.
  4. ADR-0005 TOTP-seeded SPAKE2 pairing (crypto soundness, replay, MITM).
  5. KNOWN-HAZARDS: are the listed invariants sufficient, or is something load-bearing missing?

  For each finding give: severity (FATAL / SERIOUS / MINOR), the exact ADR/file, the assumption, why it breaks, and what evidence or spike would resolve it. End with the single decision most likely to force a redesign. Be terse and technical.

preview:
  IMPORTANT: Do NOT read or execute any files under ~/.claude/, ~/.agents/, .claude/skills/, or agents/. These are Claude Code skill definitions for a different AI system. Do NOT modify agents/openai.yaml. Stay focused on repository code/docs only.

  You are a brutally honest staff-level distributed-systems architect doing an ADVERSARIAL red-team review of a design BEFORE any code is written. No compliments. Just fatal flaws, contradictions, over-engineering, and unproven load-bearing assumptions that would force a redesign.

  Read these files in the repo and review them:
  - PRD.md (requirements)
  - CONTEXT.md (glossary / domain model)
  - docs/adr/0001-clean-room-fork-from-claude-skill-owl.md
  - docs/adr/0002-bake-networking-into-core-collapse-spt-node.md
  - docs/adr/0003-multi-instance-node-anchored-identity-model.md
  - docs/adr/0004-single-daemon-broker-brain-split-and-self-update.md
  - docs/adr/0005-totp-seeded-spake2-node-pairing.md
  - docs/KNOWN-HAZARDS.md

  Context: spt-core is a harness-independent Rust core for an agent ecosystem (messaging, live-agent lifecycle, terminal hosting, P2P networking via Iroh WAN + mDNS LAN, runtime-manifest harness contract). Clean-room rebuild of claude_skill_owl. v1 scope is LOCKED as the full PRD — do NOT propose scope cuts. Finding fatal flaws IS the goal.

  Concentrate fire on the riskiest decisions, ranked:
  1. ADR-0004 broker/brain split: a PTY child + an open client socket must SURVIVE a daemon-logic restart (no-terminate handoff) + peer-propagated signed self-update. Is the no-terminate handoff actually achievable on BOTH Windows ConPTY and Linux, or is it a fatal assumption? Attack the FD/handle-passing and self-update story specifically.
  2. ADR-0002 baking networking into core / collapsing spt-node into one binary.
  3. ADR-0003 multi-instance node-anchored identity.
  4. ADR-0005 TOTP-seeded SPAKE2 pairing (crypto soundness, replay, MITM).
  5. KNOWN-HAZARDS: are the listed invariants sufficient, or is something load-bearing missing?

  For each finding give: severity (FATAL / SERIOUS / MINOR), the exact ADR/file, the assumption, why it breaks, and what evidence or spike would resolve it. End with the single decision most likely to force a redesign. Be terse and technical.


id: 019e95d6-5030-7f52-bc2e-a58718281578
source: cli
model_provider: openai
cwd: \\?\C:\Users\decid\Documents\projects\spt-core
sandbox_policy: {"type":"disabled"}
approval_mode: never
git_sha: 1ea2a35c868cf1e958918cd968ed4974265a53b3
git_branch: dev-freeform
git_origin_url: https://github.com/SaberMage/spt-core.git
cli_version: 0.137.0
memory_mode: enabled
model: gpt-5.5
reasoning_effort: high
thread_source: user
rollout_path:
  C:\Users\decid\.codex\sessions\2026\06\04\rollout-2026-06-04T20-31-51-019e95d6-5030-7f52-bc2e-a58718281578.jsonl

title:
  read "C:\Users\decid\AppData\Local\spt\psyches\tracked\agents\doyle\live_context.md" and "C:\Users\decid\AppData\Local\spt\psyches\tracked\projects\spt-core\doyle.md", then proceed with next steps under D7b. note that "crates\spt-daemon\src\applyhost.rs" was the last file written.

first_user_message:
  read "C:\Users\decid\AppData\Local\spt\psyches\tracked\agents\doyle\live_context.md" and "C:\Users\decid\AppData\Local\spt\psyches\tracked\projects\spt-core\doyle.md", then proceed with next steps under D7b. note that "crates\spt-daemon\src\applyhost.rs" was the last file written.

preview:
  read "C:\Users\decid\AppData\Local\spt\psyches\tracked\agents\doyle\live_context.md" and "C:\Users\decid\AppData\Local\spt\psyches\tracked\projects\spt-core\doyle.md", then proceed with next steps under D7b. note that "crates\spt-daemon\src\applyhost.rs" was the last file written.


id: 019e9f0b-9722-7d70-bfb6-7df028e4589b
source: cli
model_provider: openai
cwd: \\?\C:\Users\decid\Documents\projects\spt-core
sandbox_policy: {"type":"disabled"}
approval_mode: never
git_sha: b9326f48d4141e3701d5b038388fa104f70253e5
git_branch: dev-freeform
git_origin_url: https://github.com/SaberMage/spt-core.git
cli_version: 0.137.0
memory_mode: enabled
model: gpt-5.5
reasoning_effort: high
thread_source: user
rollout_path:
  C:\Users\decid\.codex\sessions\2026\06\06\rollout-2026-06-06T15-26-37-019e9f0b-9722-7d70-bfb6-7df028e4589b.jsonl

title:
  $grill-with-docs question: can our debugging process for SPT leverage its own update-in-place and peer update proliferation features? could this machine simply build both the linux and windows binaries, then proliferate updates to the whole SPT subnet?

first_user_message:
  $grill-with-docs question: can our debugging process for SPT leverage its own update-in-place and peer update proliferation features? could this machine simply build both the linux and windows binaries, then proliferate updates to the whole SPT subnet?

preview:
  $grill-with-docs question: can our debugging process for SPT leverage its own update-in-place and peer update proliferation features? could this machine simply build both the linux and windows binaries, then proliferate updates to the whole SPT subnet?


